ISCAR review form

In order to provide submitters with a guide as to how their proposals will evaluated, the review form to be used by reviewers is included below. Each proposal will evaluated at least by 2 reviewers. If the reviews differ in their evaluation of the proposal, a third reviewer may be consulted. The review process will be coordinated by Prof. Ligorio (bealigorio@hotmail.com).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ISCAR Review form

The aim of this form is to assess the quality of the abstracts submitted to ISCAR Conference 2011. The form is built in such a way that both theoretical and research abstracts can be equally assessed.

1	- Not at all acceptable	6	- Sufficient
2	- Inadequate	7	- Good
3	- Very poor	8	- Very good
4	- Poor	9	- Excellent
5	- Insufficient	10	- Outstanding

Abstract n. __________________ Reviewer Name: _______________________________________


Affilitation: ________________________ e-mail: _________________________________________

 

Points of attention		Your rate (1-10)	Please, write here some argumentation about your score.
1 - Novelty and innovative value
2 – Clarity of the problem stated
3 - Recent and relevant literature
4 – Research question /hypothesis
5 - Research design, methodology and data analysis / Theoretical reasoning, review of previous work and theoretical argumentation used to support conclusions
6 - Appropriateness of the interpretation and discussion part / Appropriateness of the conclusions
7 – Theoretical/Practical implications
8 – Overall organization of the abstract
9 – Clarity of the language
10 - Appropriateness to ISCAR
TOTAL SCORE

 

Your general recommendation (cross the square you select): - Accept < > - Reject < >

 

Please add your specific comments to justify your score and your recommendation.